Wednesday, February 29

Too busy to read Dickens?

The edition of Pickwick Papers I am reading. The heroic and rotund Mr. Pickwick appears on both pages; I'm guessing the other gentleman is Mr. Augustus Snodgrass. Unless it's Nathaniel Winkle.
Of course I'm already way behind on my Dickens project. The idea was to read a Dickens novel a month, and it does not look as though I will make it through the remaining seven-eighths of Pickwick Papers by tomorrow. I'm hampered by the need to finish a massive biography of Catherine the Great before it finishes us (M reads it aloud to me in bed and I am afraid that if he falls asleep while holding it above his face it will fall and break his nose).

I'm hoping the audio version of Pickwick will arrive at the library soon and speed things up. 

If all else fails, there is this:

Too busy to read Dickens? Then try the digested read

John Crace has conveniently pre-masticated several Dickens novels for us. He romps through Great Expectations in a mere 1619 words, and really you can't tell the difference.

Unfortunately there is no digested version of Pickwick, so I will have to continue reading it myself. Still, an excellent option for those too busy to do their own reading and too cheap to hire someone to do it for them.

.......................

(By the way, the biography of Catherine the Great is by Robert K. Massie and it's wonderful. There's a nice article about it, and him, in the New York Times. Mr. Massie is 82 and has previously published biographies of Peter the Great and of Nicholas and Alexandra.)

Sunday, February 26

The wages of accordion is Oscar


Ludovic Bource, who just won the Academy Award for Original Score on the movie The Artist, played accordion as a child. Just saying.

Wednesday, February 22

Teaching an old owl new tricks

The good news about owls appears in a New York Times article, informatively titled: "Gary Marcus, Cognitive Psychologist, Answers Readers' Questions."

The research was actually performed by Stanford biologist Eric Knudsen, who discovered that, although older owls found it harder to compensate for perceptual distortions than baby owls, given enough time the oldsters could manage just fine. The important factor was breaking the job down into smaller segments.

Words to live by.

Thursday, February 16

If I only had a brain (for marketing)

If I had more of a marketing brain (the marketing portion of my brain is tucked away somewhere near the areas devoted to vestigial gills and DOS commands), I could have jazzed up my accordion process by making it more suspenseful. 

It seems to me that the most effective way to do this is to put a time limit on it: I will cook my way through Julia Child in a year, I will not buy anything from one January to the next, I will learn to manufacture my own acrylic nails with seasonal motifs in the basement ... no that's silly, that last one doesn't have a time limit.

If I were a smart cookie, my accordion project, instead of being open-ended and somewhat diffuse, could instead have been something like: I will play my way through the collected bandoneon works of Astor Piazolla in one year. Ready, set, go! -- Or, closer to reality, I will become the world's leading exponent of "Charlie the Chimp," one note per month. And they're off!

Instead, it has been much more than a year, and international fame owing to mastery of "Charlie the Chimp" still eludes me. This is not for lack of trying! But it may be due to a certain lack of focus.

Because the accordion is not my only project -- far from it! This year alone I have embarked on two completely different projects, both of which must be completed by December 31, 2012. If you are thinking: My God, the pressure must be killing her! -- you are right.

Either alone would be daunting. But I choose to perform both of these challenges in the same year. Why? Because I am afraid that otherwise I will forget them, like everything else.

1. I will read all the Dickens novels in one year. 

No joking. And I'm already a month behind because I only thought of it halfway through February. There are Dickens novels I have read and am very fond of, and others that I imagine I am fond of but it turns out I have never read. Never, ever. Like about three quarters of them. 

So Dickens's bicentenary seemed a good time to rectify the situation, and make an honest woman of myself. And also maybe focus my mind enough to finish something besides another Michael Connelly or Sara Paretsky audiobook.

I'm starting with the Pickwick Papers, which is a slower go than I had imagined. I am working through it in book form, ebook library download and audiobook simultaneously. Wish me luck.

2. I will get rid of a book a day.

You heard me -- one a day. Each and every day of this year I am culling one book, read or unread, hard cover or soft, English or in some aspirational language I don't actually read. 

So far I have selected 52 books for slaughter recycling. They are spilling out of a red Knob Hill shopping basket on the floor. It is all I can do to stop myself from sneaking out of bed in the dead of night and restoring them to their rightful place on the shelves. 

There is always a good reason to keep a book. Unread? Might read it someday. Read many times already? Will miss it when I inevitably crave reading it again. Ancient yellowing copy that will fall apart if ever opened? Obviously a collector's item. Written in ancient Sumerian? You never know ...

Still, the first month was pretty easy. But I know that soon the going will get tough, and then tougher. I can't think what I'll be like in September -- a hollow-eyed ghost of my former self, I should think, pacing the house while wringing my hands and muttering about all the perfumes of Araby. 

I'm already thinking of handing off March to Michael, and making him get rid of 31 of his books instead. Why should I bear all the responsibility for creating airy designer shelf space in our home?

I'll even offer him a handicap: each golf magazine counts as a book.

Are we on?

Thursday, February 9

An a-ha moment


Norwegian artist Morten Traavik posted this great video of North Korean accordionists in Pyongyang playing their version of "Take On Me" by Norwegian group a-ha.

It didn't ring any bells for me, so I asked Michael if he remembered the song. He looked at me as though I had asked him if he had heard of a new computer thing called Facebook, and who are these people called ABBA anyway?

He suggested I listen to the original version of "Take On Me."



... Nope. 

I must have been having a little rest that year.

Apparently the North Korean accordionists performed this for Traavik two days after he gave them a CD of the song.
All content copyright 2008-2012 Diana Kiesners